Thanks for your reply.

I received the demo copy today. I was immediately struck by the non-CUA
compliant screens, primarily because I have studied interface issues. I
have trouble trusting a program that didn't bother getting the interface
right; I generally assume that they made other mistakes (and have been
disappointed to be right about that). Have you encountered any bugs,
problems, limitations? For instance, while examining the HP ARPA ftp
server in a RUMBA HP session, I selected some text, chose print, and
RUMBA GPFd, leaving my session alive on the 3K. Reflection never GPFd
for me under Win 3.x or 95. although there were times that I could not
print from a session, probably due to network problems (starting a new
instance cleared that).

We are also looking at MiniSoft's NP92 for printing; any experience
there?

Opinions are my own.
>----------
>From:  SIMPKINS, Terry[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
>Sent:  Tuesday, October 22, 1996 2:56 PM
>To:    Stigers, Gregory - ANDOVER
>Subject:       RE: Emulators
>
>
>
>We use Minisoft and are very happy.  They are supstantially cheaper that WRQ
>(especially if you need TCP-IP access).  They are very responsive to problems
>and listen to improvement suggestions (often making the enhancement before a
>"regular" release).
>I have no interest in them other than to encourage and support products that
>are good, reasonably priced, and well supported.
>Terry Simpkins
>
> ----------
>> From: Stigers, Gregory - ANDOVER
>> To: HP3000-L
>> Subject: Emulators
>> Date: Tuesday, October 22, 1996 5:57PM
>>
>> I have been charged with researching HP 3000 terminal emulators that
>> support dial-up and file transfer / upload & download. I have used
>> Reflection elsewhere; everyone else here uses RUMBA (but how do I
>> transfer files?); I have already called MiniSoft for a demo. Are there
>> any other players I should know about?
>