 
| Subject: | |
| From: | |
| Reply To: | [log in to unmask][log in to unmask], 18 Oct 1996 08:13:20 PDT487_- Neil comments in response to Lee's performance numbers with DLT: >Lee observed...... [and I trimmed] >> >>For anyone who's interested in using DLT on the HP3000: >> >>In the latter case, we set up our full system backup one >>evening to use the DLTs in parallel, and the backup took >>4.75 hours and consumed 2 DLT cartridges .... Our current >>backup ... takes approximately 8 hours ... > [...]47_18Oct199608:13: [log in to unmask] |
| Date: | Fri, 18 Oct 1996 08:21:31 -0700 |
| Content-Type: | text/plain |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Curt,
One reason for leaving could be a company is purchased by a larger company who's
primary system(s) are something else.
Another reason could be the purchase of a product from a vendor that is designed
to run on another system.
It looks like we will be staying on the HP3000 for awhile, but in today's world,
how knows?
Rich
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Where have all the HP3000's gone...
Author: Curt Tueffert <[log in to unmask]> at ~INTERNET
Date: 10/17/96 8:38 PM
Can you help me? Many of my clients are moving away from the HP3000 family for
many reasons. those staying are loyal and have custom software applications
built for this platform. I am 100% in favor of the HP3000. We've been
supporting it since 1979.
What I am doing is compiling a list of people who have left the HP3k family, the
people who are staying, and the ones on the fence.
What caused them to leave or stay? What would it take to push them off the
fence?
Care to share some thoughts? Return reply.
Curt Tueffert
Hawthorne Computer Center, Portland, OR.
|
|
|
