[log in to unmask][log in to unmask], 3 Oct 1996 10:23:59 EST374_- > Is this even a wise choice at this point? Would a 9x8 box (or later) be a > "better" choice?
Depending on your processing load, one of the newer 9x9 boxes would be the best choice.
> As PowerHouse 7.x is the primary development environment, would it be best > to approach Cognos first to see how much box we can afford? [...]45_3Oct199610:23:[log in to unmask]
Buffspecs are ignored in TurboImage, now - since MPE/XL 3.1 or 4.0, I
believe - so setting them has no effect.
Lee
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: TurboImage database and buffspecs
Author: Gary Jackson <[log in to unmask]> at ~INTERNET
Date: 10/2/96 8:20 AM
In years past there was a recommendation to change buffspecs so that buffers
were not changing so often. Is this still the case (we are on 5.0)? If so,
and we have a 100 user license, should the buffspecs be set to something
like 20(1/100) or is it not that simple?
Gary Jackson
Nevada CSOS
(916) 478-6407 - voice
(916) 478-6410 - fax