HP3000-L Archives

September 1996, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Alan AMBERS <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Alan AMBERS <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 11 Sep 1996 12:35:00 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (44 lines)
Hi all -
 
Yesterday, I sent this message to hp3000-l and receieved 3 copies of the
"held" message from the l-soft-server (or whatever).  I never did see the
message on HP3000-l (I am set to mail repro.)
 
Anyway, could someone bounce a message back to me that this message made
it.
 
Thanks  /alan
 
Now here is the unix vs HP3000 stuff.
 
Steve said....
> I seem to see this thread (moving from HP3000 to Unix) re-introduced
> from
> time-to-time and it usually contains the words "my new Boss" or "the new
> owners" want us to move from the HP3000 to Unix. I'm tryng to remember
> the
> last time the topic was acompanied by the words "the people who have
> been
> running the business successfully for years and who understand all of >
the
> business and systems implications want us to move from the HP3000 to
> Unix".
>
> Steve
 
> [log in to unmask]
 
I think "the people who have been running the business...want us to move
from the HP3000 to Unix" are saying this.  We have always been an HP3000
shop, but now some software packages that we need are only available on
Unix.
 
These moves are dictated by software availablity....which is dictated by
installed base....which is dictated by software avaibility....(you get the
picture)   Before anyone adds, yes a little Marketing always helps.
 
as always, my opinion....
 
/alan
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2