HP3000-L Archives

August 1996, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bill Lancaster <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Bill Lancaster <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 24 Aug 1996 22:22:44 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
Who are you???
>
>We are about to implement a Data Repository at our company to offload the
>adhoc reporting burden from our HP3000. Our research has discovered many
>ways to extract the data from the Turboimage database for export to other
>platforms. One that is rather inexpensive (comes with Image) is image logging.
>Our manager is concerned with the performance hit on the production processor
>from past stories under older operating systems. Can anyone give me your
>real life account of the impact on the system? We simply want a method to
>capture the transactions without resorting to very expensive third party
>software (some company that begins with the letter 'Q').
>
>Our current productoin machine is an HP3000/999-100 with 512Mb of memory
>and running MPE/iX 5.0 Powerpatch 3. We would like to move to 5.5 this
>fall after a powerpatch comes out. The network addressable printers is the
>big push for this.
>
>
Before anybody can answer your question, we need to know how busy your current
system is.  I have seen estimates for Image logging around 8 percent but I
haven't
actually observed it that high on an MPE/iX system.  That estimate may be a
residual from the classic days.
 
Actually, it should be easy to just try it.  Before you do, make sure that
your obtain
a "before" performance picture.
 
Bill
---
Bill Lancaster         Lancaster Consulting
(541)926-1542 (phone)  (541)917-0807 (fax)
[log in to unmask]       http://www.proaxis.com/~bill

ATOM RSS1 RSS2