On 19 Jun 96 at 8:10, Kyle Parrish wrote:
> Hummmm....their tenacity still hasn't produced a robust desktop operating
> system. Windows 95 is laughable.
I sure won't argue with Win/95, however, I have found Win/NT to be
pretty good. For what I need, win/nt seems to be more stable than
win, wfwg and win/95.
My $.02 worth.
Larry