HP3000-L Archives

May 1996, Week 5

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Martin O'Murphy <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Martin O'Murphy <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 28 May 1996 12:27:31 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
MR JOHN P BURKE wrote:
>
> -- [ From: John P. Burke * EMC.Ver #2.10P ] --
>
> Larry Boyd said:
>
> >OK, Kumar, its great and wonderful that you solved the problem so
> >quickly ;). However, for those of us who still can't remember the
> >steps, what are they? ...
>
> What a treat! A question I can answer (having spent the first 28 years
> of my life discovering that I was not the next John Von Neuman) that
> has not already been answered (the hazard of getting this list in
> digest form the day after - unlike those who seem to get and respond in
> real time). So before I get the digest for Saturday and discover
> someone else has already supplied the proof:
>
> The quadratic equation ax^2+bx+c=0 where a<>0 is a special case of the
> general second degree polynomial y=f(x)=ax^2+bx+c, which geometrically
> describes a parabola. In particular, if f(x), when graphed, touches or
> intersects the x-axis, then f(x)=0 has a solution(s) which is simply
> the value of x at the point of contact with the x-axis
 
[more similar stuff snipped]
 
Well, Larry........you did ask!   :-)
 
Martin.
 
-Speaking for myself, not my company.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2