Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 18 May 1996 16:35:20 +1000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At Fri, 17 May 1996 10:50:17 -0700, Bruce Toback <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
[snip...]
>Going back to the original suggestion, if you go to NIC and get your very
>own Class C, any ISP who connects your network to the Internet has to see
>to it that all the hundreds of backbone routers administered by dozens of
>companies that Gavin mentioned have your address in them. If you accept
>the ISP's CIDR address assignment, they only have to change their own
>routers. The extra work is the cause of the ISP's reluctance and/or price
>increase.
Gee, doesn't this sound like a job that could be automated using computers? %^)
Anyone know the status of the proposal for updating to larger IP addresses
(8 octets, yes?)? I thought it was to be voted on mid-year, but can't be
sure. Hopefully, this will provide for geographical routing as well as
other heirarchies, easing the load on routers and network backbones.
----
Jim "seMPEr" Wowchuk
Vanguard Computer Services Internet: [log in to unmask]
_--_|\ Compu$erve: 100036,106
/ \ Post: PO Box 18, North Ryde, NSW 2113
\.--.__/ <---Sydney NSW Phone: +61 (2) 888-9688
v Australia Fax: +61 (2) 888-3056
|
|
|