Denys Beauchemin wrote:
>
> In a message dated 96-05-03 09:32:21 EDT, [log in to unmask] (Larry
> Boyd) writes:
> >
> >Just trying to my standard kick-back :)
> >
> >Larry "Let's see: tot_stand_kick_back=tot_stand_kick_back+0" Boyd
>
> In C that would read:  tot_stand_kick_back++;
 
Actually, it would be: tot_stand_kick_back += 0;
Your suggestion is the equiv. of "tot_stand_kick_back=tot_stand_kick_back+1"
 
> That depends of course whether you will kick back after the deed.
 
I'm still waiting for Larry's first spelling error since the purchase of
his new dictionary.
 
--
Michael D. Hensley              | [log in to unmask] (personal)
Software Development Manager    | [log in to unmask]     (business)
Lund Performance Solutions      | http://www.lund.com