Larry Boyd wrote:
 
>Another interesting 'feature' that I've seen used, is the fact that the
value of the item
>you lock on does not need to exist.
 
<snip>
 
Locking things that don't exist -- doesn't this start to fall under the
topic of "IMAGE by spite"?
 
Although I've never tried it, I believe you can also lock data sets that you
don't have read or write access to; now *that's* IMAGE by spite!
 
 -- Evan