HP3000-L Archives

March 1996, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Larry Boyd <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Larry Boyd <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 1 Mar 1996 07:22:51 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
KLRenk <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I have heard and seen articles about just making LDEV 1 the only volume in
> the system volume set and creating a different volume set for the rest.
> What is this groups feelings on segregating LDEV 1.   Is it worth it?
>
> I am in the process of upgrading our hp3000 to 939ks and deciding whether
> or not to do it.   LDEV 1 is a 2db drive.  Any thoughts would be
> appreciated....
 
My *personal* opinion is that it is a good idea to remove everything
off the system volume set except for FOS and subsys.  There could be
some argument for putting all utility type software required for your
system on the system VS also, but I don't feel strongly either way
about this.
 
If you want to do this on one drive, you may find problems.  How big
is you FOS and subsys (depending on the products you own from HP this
is variable).
 
The second problem is having all system VS I/O going through one drive.
Based on your box, I would suggest to start with 2 drives.  Having system
VS all on one drive can (most likely) cause I/O performance problems.  You
might look at splitting to at least 2 or 3 drives if you do find a performance issue.
 
Again, this is *my* opinion.  I'm sure there will be some who have
additional advice.
 
Larry Boyd    <[log in to unmask]>
"Each problem solved creates the opportunity to solve the next problem
          that the last solution created." - Richard Pascale
(These opinions are my own and not those of Hewlett-Packard.)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2