HP3000-L Archives

March 1996, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Question Concerning Volume Management of Disks?
From:
Richard Gambrell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Richard Gambrell <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 6 Mar 1996 21:31:32 CST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines) 
Mark Ranft wrote (in part)
>
> If the failure is on the system volume set, the recovery time is also
> decreased.  (But I
> think that was already meantioned.)  I do not know if anyone meantioned the
> advantage of
> non-system volume sets having their own Transaction Manager(XM) logfiles.  This
> increases
> transaction throughput by spreading the load.
>
 
Could you (or someone) please clarify the handling of the XM log files? Where
are they (system volume set or user volume set) for each volume set? I've
heard too many explanations that are contradictory. Thanks much!
 
--
-- - - - Speaking for myself and not necessarily anybody else - - - - - -
Richard Gambrell        | Internet: [log in to unmask]
Mgr. Tech. Services     | POT:      504-483-7454     FAX: 504-482-1561
Xavier University of LA | Smail:    7325 Palmetto, New Orleans, LA 70125

ATOM RSS1 RSS2