Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 23 Jan 1996 20:59:05 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Jon wrote:
>Now, we realized we own some older equiptment that we dont want
>anymore and are considering trading the old equiptment for 2 or 4 more f/w
>4GB drives - obviously, to add ot the mirrored array. This would give us a
>maximum of 5 devices on each of our two f/w channels. Suddenly, our SSE
>claims that HP does not recommend more than *3* devices on a f/w channel -
>or shazam! there goes our performance. Does anyone have any insight on this?
There is no problem to put 5 devices on a f/w channel. In fact, you don't
have to worry about the channel issue until you reach 9 or so.
However, I do concern that if you have enough disks to handle the I/O load!
Even though currently you have 6 disks for you production data, you really
just have 3 disks to spread the I/O load (since they are mirrored). Make
sure all performance critical data are evenly spread across all disks.
If you know your average and peak I/O rate, you can figure out how many
disks are needed to support the demand. 3 sounds tight, I would feel more
comfortable with 5. Good luck.
Paul Wang phone: (408) 988-7378
SolutionSoft Systems, Inc. fax : (408) 988-4777
email: [log in to unmask]
|
|
|