In a message dated 96-01-21 18:21:56 EST, [log in to unmask] (Jeff Kell)
writes:
 
>I understand your concern for "compatibility" which HP has been an industry
>leader.  But in this case, I feel very strongly that emulating the previous
>behavior negates the intent of DDX to begin with.  HP hasn't changed their
>own applications to accomodate 205, how can we expect everyone else to?
>Almost everything DDX was supposed to "fix" is negated by leaving 202 as is.
>
>
 
Begrudingly, I must concede the point and agree with you.  I can't really see
any problems with changing the behavior of DBINFO 202, and os perhaps I am
missing something.  But your arguments make sense.
 
Kind regards,
 
Denys. . .