HP3000-L Archives

January 1996, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Larry Boyd <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Larry Boyd <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 26 Jan 1996 07:30:55 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Stan wrote:
>    5) QUERY's FO setname command will be changed, with the addition of
>       one extra line after the "CAPACITY:" line, so that the last few
>       lines of output look like:
>
>            CAPACITY: 10000             ENTRIES:0
>            MAXIMUM CAPACITY: 111,234,567,890
Well, it seems trivial not to go ahead and add:
          CAPACITY: 10000              ENTRIES: 0
          INCREASE BY: 1000            MAXIMUM CAPACITY: 111,234,567,890
 
Anyway, based on the discussions about 202 and 205, it seems it would be
a *real* good idea to get a small group picked out by the SIEC to lay out
a reasonable request.  Once done, submit it as an SR (to cover the
"standard" procedure), and to the SIG for voting at IPROF.
 
This will save a lot of moaning at the meeting.  SIGIMAGE has laid out
the request, submitted the SR and presenting it to SIG, now it's not
questionable about the need/want/or whatever of the users.
 
Larry 'be sure to read the next line' Boyd
(BTW, these opinions are my own and not those of HP's.)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2