HP3000-L Archives

January 1996, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"<Elbert E Silbaugh>" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 19 Jan 1996 16:09:37 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Ron Seybold writes...
 
>Expect HP to be moving ever upward in capacities they're willing to build.
>Smaller drives will become something that other makers will be more likely
>to manufacture. HP sells a lot of drives, but I don't know if they're
>willing to get into commodity-volume lines. Believe it or not, 2Gb is
>headed for that designation soon. When you consider the test and design
>extras HP throws into its versions of SCSI drives, they may not be willing
>to invest that kind of effort on many different sizes of drives. Once they
>start selling 8.75Gb units for 3000s -- by my guess, sometime next year --
>it may be the extra unit that pushes the 2Gb units out of HP's
>manufacturing line.
 
hmmm..
 
Does this mean that until they get the transfer rates up to match
the potential volume for a fairly full 8gb drive, we will see
systems with a bunch of 8gb drives at only 25% full because of
transfer rate/performance problems?
 
Elbert

ATOM RSS1 RSS2