Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 18 Jan 1996 19:14:24 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Rich asks:
> I'm fishing for some clues: Does anybody know/have any info about
> whether or not the number of modules in an XL affects the load time of a
> program using only a single module in that XL?
Probably.
Worse still, since loading is paid for only once, is:
1) calls from myprog to mysub (inter-module calls) will take many more
instructions than intra-module calls.
2) the XL will be larger than necessary (using disk, memory, cache,
upload time (for your phone support people)).
When building an XL, I usually specify ";LIMIT=n", where "n" is a small
integer .. if you don't the XL is built with a directory (?) much bigger
than you'll probably ever need (and wasting about 800 sectors).
When I add my modules into an XL, I usually specify ";MERGE", to make them
go into one module. Of course, this may make replacing one part of the
XL more difficult ... but the payoff is worth it to me.
--
Stan Sieler [log in to unmask]
http://www.allegro.com/sieler.html
|
|
|