HP3000-L Archives

January 1996, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Leonard S. Berkowitz" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Leonard S. Berkowitz
Date:
Mon, 8 Jan 1996 11:51:00 PST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (48 lines)
Yes,  QUERYNM, if it is no longer the Beta version should come as
QUERY.PUB.SYS.  I have no problem with QUERY ("PROG") coming on the tape as
QUERYCM.
 
=======================================================================
Leonard S. Berkowitz                    voice: (617) 423-2020
Warren, Gorham & Lamont                 fax: (617) 423-9057
31 St. James Avenue                e-mail: [log in to unmask]
Boston, Massachusetts 02116
 ----------
>From: owner-hp3000-l%UTCVM.UTC.EDU
>To: Multiple recipients of list HP3000-L
>Subject: Default QUERY still CM on C.05.03
>Date: Saturday, January 06, 1996 12:57AM
>
>---------------------- Information from the mail header
>-----------------------
>Sender:       HP-3000 Systems Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
>Poster:       Netnews Server <[log in to unmask]>
>Organization: Hewlett-Packard Mayfield Site
>Subject:      Default QUERY still CM on C.05.03
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 ----
>-
>
>There has been a lot of discussion regarding QUERYCM vs. QUERYNM. I would
>like to raise two points:
>
>     1. QUERYNM is a FULLY SUPPORTED product. If you wish to :RENAME
QUERYNM
>        to QUERY(.PUB.SYS) and make it the default QUERY product, do so.
>        If you encounter an "undesirable feature", an SR can be submitted
>        and it will be looked at by the QUERY lab.
>
>     2. If you believe that QUERYNM should replace QUERYCM as the default
>        QUERY.PUB.SYS, please let SIGIMAGE know. If SIGIMAGE recommends
this
>        change, there is probably no reason why it shouldn't happen, unless
>        the QUERY lab has some strong objection.
>
>The latest QUERY version is D/N.03.06 . As of this writing, it is still has
>a BETA classification.
>
>----------
>Steve Patrick
>HP Database Expert Center
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2