Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Leonard S. Berkowitz |
Date: | Mon, 8 Jan 1996 11:51:00 PST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Yes, QUERYNM, if it is no longer the Beta version should come as
QUERY.PUB.SYS. I have no problem with QUERY ("PROG") coming on the tape as
QUERYCM.
=======================================================================
Leonard S. Berkowitz voice: (617) 423-2020
Warren, Gorham & Lamont fax: (617) 423-9057
31 St. James Avenue e-mail: [log in to unmask]
Boston, Massachusetts 02116
----------
>From: owner-hp3000-l%UTCVM.UTC.EDU
>To: Multiple recipients of list HP3000-L
>Subject: Default QUERY still CM on C.05.03
>Date: Saturday, January 06, 1996 12:57AM
>
>---------------------- Information from the mail header
>-----------------------
>Sender: HP-3000 Systems Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
>Poster: Netnews Server <[log in to unmask]>
>Organization: Hewlett-Packard Mayfield Site
>Subject: Default QUERY still CM on C.05.03
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
>-
>
>There has been a lot of discussion regarding QUERYCM vs. QUERYNM. I would
>like to raise two points:
>
> 1. QUERYNM is a FULLY SUPPORTED product. If you wish to :RENAME
QUERYNM
> to QUERY(.PUB.SYS) and make it the default QUERY product, do so.
> If you encounter an "undesirable feature", an SR can be submitted
> and it will be looked at by the QUERY lab.
>
> 2. If you believe that QUERYNM should replace QUERYCM as the default
> QUERY.PUB.SYS, please let SIGIMAGE know. If SIGIMAGE recommends
this
> change, there is probably no reason why it shouldn't happen, unless
> the QUERY lab has some strong objection.
>
>The latest QUERY version is D/N.03.06 . As of this writing, it is still has
>a BETA classification.
>
>----------
>Steve Patrick
>HP Database Expert Center
>
|
|
|