Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 10 Jan 1996 14:10:44 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In <[log in to unmask]> [log in to unmask] writes:
> We in CSY Lab are investigating the feasibility of providing Multiple Job
> Accepting Queues on MPE/iX. We are still in the preliminary investigation
> stage and as yet, no decision has been taken to implement this enhancement.
> As part of this investigation, we would like to know customers'
> expectations and requirements regarding this feature.
Mohan (and group!);
I'd first like to add my appreciation for the opportunity to provide
feedback on this potential feature. I've been one of the backers of this
enhancement for quite a while, and would like to throw in my $.02 in hopes
that it might provide another viewpoint and perhaps something to think
about.
Currently input spoolfiles are kept in IN.HPSPOOL (aka /HPSPOOL/IN). How
about simply(?) using HFS and allowing the creation of a hierarchy of
directories under /HPSPOOL/IN denoting additional input queues, perhaps
something like:
/HPSPOOL/IN {contains default input spoolfiles as today}
/HPSPOOL/IN/01MAINTQ {contains input spoolfiles in MAINTQ queue}
/HPSPOOL/IN/01PAYROLLQ{ditto PAYROLLQ queue}
/HPSPOOL/IN/06DEV {ditto DEV queue}
/HPSPOOL/IN/08LOWPRI {ditto LOWPRI queue}
Where each directory under /HPSPOOL/IN would have the input spoolfiles
for waiting jobs which were put into that queue either by the ;JOBQ (or
whatever) parm on the !JOB card, or by overriding it with a ;JOBQ= on the
:STREAM command. Some advantages of this setup; by using the first two digits
/places of the directory name as a numeric sorting sequence, directories
could be searched in order for the next "job-in-line" - an order which can
be forced by the use of ordering the directories numerically. Also, the
directories could be subject to normal MPE/HFS access restrictions; so one
could add ACDs or other restrictions defining who could place jobs in which
queues.
A .limit file (or somesuch) could be created in each directory with just
a two digit job limit for that queue (or additional parms if desired) with
defaults taking precedence if the file is removed.
I like the idea of replacing the IN-dev in the showjob display with the
queue name, though it would have to be a non-default format since I'm sure
there are a lot of programs/command files depending on the showjob format
now. I also like the idea of a default queue for a user.account, but the
order of precedance should be:
<default queue based on user.account in !job card>
<jobq= parm on !job card>
<jobq= parm on :STREAM command>
<:ALTJOB ;jobq= specified by OP/SM>
Now, back to watching the snowplows! ;-)
______________________/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_
Chris Bartram Sales (US): 800 Net-Mail Fax:+1 703 451-3720
______ -or- +1 703 569-9189 E-Mail: [log in to unmask]
/__ | \__________ Sales (Europe):+44(0480)414131 Fax:+44(0480)414134
/ / | / ________ Sales (Pacific Rim):+61 3 489 8216 (same for fax)
| /_ |< ______ Tech Support:+1 703 569-9189 Fax:+1 703 451-3720
\ __)| \ ___ E-mail: [log in to unmask] Personal(me): [log in to unmask]
\______/ Associates 6901 Old Keene Mill Rd Suite 205 Springfield VA 22150
______________________/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_
Gopher: gopher.3k.com Anon-FTP: ftp.3k.com WWW: http://www.3k.com/
|
|
|