>to :rename query,querycm and :rename querynm,query and wait for somebody to
>complain. They never did.
>
>I don't know that I would have been as brave (back then) to replace QUERY
>with a symbolic link to querynm, but it's the same philosophy (assuming that
>they saved a copy of query(cm) somewhere).
Jeff, I would tend to agree with you. However, QUERYNM has come a long way
since then. It's still not perfect (and probably never will be) but you
should be able to use it with the same confidence as QUERYCM.
Steve Patrick
HP Database Expert Center