Hi,
 
  Thanks for your suggestions.
 
Jon Diercks wrote:
 
> > Also RAW causes non-printable characters to appear as '.'.
>
> Whoops!  When did this sneak in?  I think that filtering of non-printable
> characters would be a good option to have, but I don't think it should be
> folded into the ;RAW option.
 
  I agree with your suggestion of RAW implies 'unprocessed'. Note that
  this does not apply to page breaks (set ;page=0 to print binary data
  continuously).
 
  Having said that, how important is it to have the non-printable character
  filtering option?. Our SR back log does not show any request on this issue.
  So, I guess no one felt a real need for this.
 
Thanks and regards,
 
Gopi ([log in to unmask])