Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Leonard S. Berkowitz |
Date: | Fri, 29 Dec 1995 10:41:00 PST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Sorry to reply to the whole group, but message to David Lethe was bounced
twice.
I would appreciate this information. We have a 980-200.
Thanks.
----------
>From: owner-hp3000-l%UTCVM.UTC.EDU
>To: Multiple recipients of list HP3000-L
>Subject: Re: MPE poor performance
>Date: Friday, December 29, 1995 8:52AM
>
>---------------------- Information from the mail header
>-----------------------
>Sender: HP-3000 Systems Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
>Poster: "David A. Lethe" <[log in to unmask]>
>Organization: Datasys Computer Corporation
>Subject: Re: MPE poor performance
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
>-
>
>There is absolutely no doubt that some systems will run slower with
>MPE/iX 5.0. This is because HP chose not to compile code to the lowest
>common denominator PA-Risc hardware.
>
>Specifically 9x7 class machines will generally see no performance
>gains/losses, while the older systems should see 10-15% slower execution
>on certain applications...
>
>I have the specifics on what programs, percentage losses, etc... but I
>guess that anybody with the older hardware already knows this
>information, and anybody with the new hardware doesn't need it anyway.
>
>Happy new year
>
>David
>
|
|
|