Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 15 Dec 1995 15:31:22 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Fri, 15 Dec 1995, Richard Gambrell wrote:
> Jim wrote:
> >
> >
> > This is exactly the scenario that prevents me from purchasing OV
> > DTC manager to obtain nailed port access through my DTC based
> > X.25 card. Despite a considerable amount of effort on my part I
> > still have yet to get a sensible answer as to why a piece of
> > equipment so highly regarded for its reliablity and robustness
> > (the HP3000 family) is deliberately tied by its manufacturer to
> > the "motherboard of the week architecture" from Intel and
> > brethern.
>
> Ken, did you have the DTC Manger PC on a UPS?
>
> However, I tend to agree with Jim that HP should have implemented
> more DTC functionality under host based management. They could have
> done OV as a client/server with the HP3000 the server and *any* Windows
> PC the client.
>
You can add _my_ vote to this!
Don Harrington Boeing Commercial Airplane Group
(206) 931-4457 voice P. O. Box 3707 M/S 5J-34
(206) 931-9085 FAX Seattle, WA 98124-2207
[log in to unmask]
These thoughts are owned by the person expressing them, and no one else!
|
|
|