HP3000-L Archives

November 1995, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Cole <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 10 Nov 1995 08:32:40 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
In a message dated 95-11-09 17:20:39 EST, [log in to unmask] (Doug Perry)
writes:
 
---> A lot of great information that is of value to anyone interested in
---> the Workload Manager.  Doug answered a lot of the questions
---> that were being ask.  In concluding Doug wrote:
 
>So to me, the determiner of the need for the Workload Manager is not
>the size or speed of the system;  it is the presence or absence of
>competing populations of processes which need to be controlled.
>
>
>Doug Perry, MPE/iX Lab
>
>
 
Doug's statement probaly best summarizes the criteria for determining
the need for the Workload Manager. I have observered several cases
where implementing the Workload Manager has prevented system
upgrades and resolved serious performance issues.
 
Now if HP will provide an equivalent tool that will permit the same
control over the memory manager.
 
Steve Cole
Outer Banks Solutions, Inc.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2