Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 23 Aug 1995 16:16:23 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Jeff writes:
....
>I also want LPR/LPD, but the lab answer to this one is that lpr/lpd is
>a file transfer protocol and not a spooler driver. Despite their answer,
>I would like to see an LPR-type device class that would behave like a
>spool queue and, for files READY and > OUTFENCE, would transfer to a
>specified IP address using LPR protocol.
>So, if you want lpr/lpd, make it known to HP. It was perceived as a
>low priority item as opposed to direct spooling support of the newer
>printers (5000 C30/C40, etc) over the network.
If LPR/LPD is a file transfer protocol and abides by whatever standards
that includes, then how can you have a legitimate print queue managed on
the 3000 that handles paper out, connect breaks, paper jams, etc, etc..??
I guess I must be missing something here as to why LPR/LPD is THE
WAY TO GET THIS DONE. (Maybe I don't have all the info.)
Elbert 'In the dark' Silbaugh
|
|
|