HP3000-L Archives

August 1995, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"<Elbert E Silbaugh>" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Wed, 23 Aug 1995 16:16:23 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Jeff writes:
 
....
 
>I also want LPR/LPD, but the lab answer to this one is that lpr/lpd is
>a file transfer protocol and not a spooler driver.  Despite their answer,
>I would like to see an LPR-type device class that would behave like a
>spool queue and, for files READY and > OUTFENCE, would transfer to a
>specified IP address using LPR protocol.
 
>So, if you want lpr/lpd, make it known to HP.  It was perceived as a
>low priority item as opposed to direct spooling support of the newer
>printers (5000 C30/C40, etc) over the network.
 
If LPR/LPD is a file transfer protocol and abides by whatever standards
that includes, then how can you have a legitimate print queue managed on
the 3000 that handles paper out, connect breaks, paper jams, etc, etc..??
 
I guess I must be missing something here as to why LPR/LPD is THE
WAY TO GET THIS DONE. (Maybe I don't have all the info.)
 
Elbert 'In the dark' Silbaugh

ATOM RSS1 RSS2