HP3000-L Archives

July 1995, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Dirickson b894 westwins <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Steve Dirickson b894 westwins <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 24 Jul 1995 00:26:00 P
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
<<Which terminal emulator (Windows version) has the best performance if
it runs on Winsock stack? Especially I want to know the
advantage/disadvantage of Business Session and Reflection.>>
 
Our experience here has been that R1Win is a much more accurate HP
terminal emulator, and consistently has fewer problems. R1Win works fine
over Winsock Telnet, but works better over VT. However, to use it over VT
under Winsock, you have to have the VT part of the 3000 Connection for
Windows product.
 
The downside is that R1 is much more expensive than BSess-like 2:1.
 
Steve Dirickson        WestWin Consulting
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2