Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 4 May 1995 07:57:00 +1000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At 09:43 AM 3/5/95 -0400, Scott Herman wrote:
[snip...]
>You can't have your cake and eat it too. (well, technically you can, but
>it's quite messy and distasteful). Do you want portability or platform
>specific performance features like XL's, KSAM, turboImage, etc.
>
>Suggestion:
>If you want to use XL's and KSAM write an interface in C or Pascal and call
>it from MF COBOL, g++, or the 3rd party 'ported' product of your choice. It
>ain't hard. I've done it.
Are you suggesting then that MF COBOL can call static libraries (USL/RL) but
not shared libraries (XL)? Shared libraries aren't unknown on Unix,
especially HPUX and even Windows. What does MF COBOL do about them? Or do
we have a problem with the dynamic mechanism used by MPE?
Regards.
----
Jim "seMPEr" Wowchuk Internet: [log in to unmask]
Vanguard Computer Services Compu$erve: 100036,106
_--_|\ Post: PO Box 18, North Ryde, NSW 2113
/ \ Phone: +61 (2) 888-9688
\.--.__/ <---Sydney NSW Fax: +61 (2) 888-3056
v Australia
|
|
|