HP3000-L Archives

April 1995, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Joerger <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
John Joerger <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 26 Apr 1995 14:16:52 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
On Wed, 26 Apr 1995, Isaac Blake wrote:
> Our site for quite some time has experienced what we would classify as a high
> failure rate with our DDS drives.  We have a wide variety of HP DDS drives, in
> fact between all our systems almost every model.  The failure we were
> experiencing ranged from bad media, stuck tapes, to unexplained errors with the
   << snip >>
> One of our Operators noticed a build up in the glue both on the DDS drives and
> on the tapes themselves.  This came from the area where the small label goes
> which is on the same side as the read/write tab.  As well often this small label
> would work it's way loose, or become misaligned with the side.
 
Our Operators use the thin DYMO label tape to label both the DDS tape and
its case.  We also use HP media (90 meters).  To date, we have had great
success with our drives -- two or three minor hick-ups in 15 months.
 
The tapes are a bit more questionable.  I haven't had a chance to diagnose
the tapes that have been marked "bad" yet.  The operators believe the
text they read from the backup (we use ORBiT).  I've had 10 tapes go
"bad" in the same 15 month period, none exceeding 60 writes.
 
Regards,
 
--- John Joerger  ([log in to unmask])  ---  Press-Telegram (Long Beach)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2