Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 23 Apr 1995 17:34:10 +1000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At 04:36 PM 21/4/95 GMT, Tuukka Kirveskoski wrote:
>>As to Steve Elmer's suggestion of /usr/local/bin, this is "almost" too site
>>specific to place HP-standard links. Since FTP and Telnet are both now part
>>of the FOS, /bin would be obvious (all other shell binary links are there)
>>except as Richard pointed out, /bin should remain pure. Perhaps /usr/bin ?
/bin.. Agree should be "pure" (ha!)
/usr/local/... should be for our own code,
/usr/contrib/... contributed stuff (GNU, procmail, etc.)
/usr/bin/... sounds like a good place for HP-standard stuff; OR
/usr/lib/...
Are there any rules for this stuff?? Nah, its Unix, ain't it!? %-)
james wowchuk - vanguard computer services, [log in to unmask]
|
|
|