HP3000-L Archives

April 1995, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Duane Percox <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Duane Percox <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 6 Apr 1995 17:22:12 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
[log in to unmask] (Jack White) wrote:
 
>We are looking to replace our X.25 connections and it
>has been suggested  that we go with frame relay.  My
>understanding of frame relay is that it  is much like
>X.25, only better.  If we go with frame relay, will
>there  be a problem with the DTC48 that we have.  That
>is, will I need to  remove the X.25 card and if so,
>will this DTC support frame relay?  I  also know that
>X.25 doesn't support block mode since X.25 PAD
>connections are terminal type 24 ("Configuring System
>for Terminals ..."  5-7,5-8).  If frame relay is okay
>to use, will it allow for the use of block mode?
 
I know people who use x.25 for vplus and it seems to work ok.
Except for the non-standard hp pad issues (but that's another
story for another time). We have a customer who is using frame
relay to interconnect a remote lan to their 3k and they are
running v/plus with wrq to make the vt connection. It works ok
for them. Depending on the situation you sure gotta like the
frame relay pricing!
 
-- Duane Percox (Quintessential School Systems)
   [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2