In <[log in to unmask]> [log in to unmask] writes:
 
>
>Tony,
>
>Thanks for the list of one line descriptions, however I feel it would
be nice
>to have further details on the request.  I, like others, are somewhat
puzzled
>over the one line descriptions.
>
 
Along those same lines, I too am puzzled, especially since a large
number of the "requests" are for features supplied by third party
programs (MPEX in particular).  Many of these appear to be well thought
out requests or proposals, so I presume that a one paragraph abstract
explaining the request already exists that could have been included.
Such an abstract would likely generate a better response overall.
 
As it is, I can "comment" on many of these with "MPEX already does that"
(or Security or Streamx in certain cases), which I don't think is what
you are looking for.
 
Tom Emerson
[log in to unmask]