HP3000-L Archives

March 1995, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Rudderow, Evan" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Rudderow, Evan
Date:
Fri, 10 Mar 1995 16:31:00 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Jon Cohen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
 
<snip>
 
>   The Pull's version number is X.50.20.
>   There is a Pull Powerpatch available; it is X.50.24.
>   All the fixes in the Pull Powerpatch were incorporated into the Push.
>   The Push has shipped to all customers with support contracts.
>   The Push's version number is C.50.00.
>   The Push did ship with some "Supplemental Patches"; these were
>      in AUTOPAT, not Powerpatch, format.
>   You can easily determine the release version on the system you
>      are running by using the :SHOWME command.
>   The future Powerpatches for the Push will have version numbers
>      like C.50.01, C.50.02, etc.  The first Push based Powerpatch
>      is scheduled for the Spring timeframe.
>
>You may install the Pull Powerpatch on the Pull, but DO NOT INSTALL THE
>PULL POWERPATCH ON THE PUSH.  The Powerpatch installation instructions
>and tools do the right thing -- the Pull's Powerpatch will not qualify
>for installation on the Push.  If this happens, stop and check your
>version numbers to make sure you are doing the right thing.  Also, when
>the Push Powerpatches come out, do not attempt to install these
>Powerpatches on the Pull.
 
<snip>
 
I'd like to point out to Jon that he sent this message to the wrong list; he
should have sent it to alt.push.pull
 
 -- Evan

ATOM RSS1 RSS2