Isaac Blake ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
: Item Subject: Message text
: > Minor correction: the "owners of this policy" weren't at IPROF.  Instead,
...
: Hate to disagree with you, but I do have the name of the woman, as well as
the
: people above her.  After the meeting I was in direct contact with them to
: discuss this, and they provided the information which I posted.  I even
reviewed
...
 
: I believe now that the 5.0 push is being sent out this month, the issue will
: come to a head, and be resolved along the proper lines.
 
Sorry, the immediately following post I made said: oops, I meant SIGSoftVend,
not IPROF.
 
I should have said more about the IPROF stuff: I appreciate the work you
did with HP on the diagnostics issue ... I think without it we would be
worse off than we are now.
 
At SIGSoftVend, the woman was received poorly, since she admitted she
wasn't a decision maker, and was clearly more interested in explaining
the policy than in taking our feedback.
 
--
Stan Sieler
[log in to unmask]