HP3000-L Archives

January 1995, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jeff Kell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jeff Kell <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 18 Jan 1995 17:55:09 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
It has been my experience that predictive support works relatively well
for 79xx drives, but I don't think I've ever seen it report a problem with
anything since.  I've lost 793x (Eagle) drives on a whim with no prelude,
but have never had any problems with C2203 drives (as best as I recall).
No problems with C3024T's either (after installation -- one came from the
factory with one of the internal drives mis-cabled or mis-jumpered, I forget
which) but we've only had them about a year.
 
I'm hoping for good reliability with the new drives but your story concerns
me.  I would hope that the SCSI gear is more reliable than HP-IB.
 
One side note... I installed a DAT drive on our production system a couple of
weeks ago, the newer 2-8Gb hardware-compression drives.  The first full backup
took two tapes and six hours.  Next time I ran DEVCTRL(DEVCNTL?).MPEXL.TELESUP
to specifically enable compression, and included MAXTAPEBUF on the :STORE
command.  One tape, < 2.5 hours (approximate).  In contrast, using parallel
6250-bpi tape drives (two) we were running about 3 hours and 24 reels.
 
[\] Jeff Kell, [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2