Thanks that makes sense.
I misread the little fine print in my handbook for range!
On 5/12/23 16:06, Doug Werth wrote:
> Second parameter is a record count, not a record number. You started
> at 9001 for 18000 records. As your second number gets larger you keep
> bumping up against the EOF and getting a smaller number of entries.
>
>
> On 5/12/2023 3:54 PM, Tracy Johnson wrote:
>> You'd think the 2nd iteration would do 9000 records, not 18000.
>> Other iterations simply advance 27000, 36000, 45000, 54001. It
>> starts to break down on the 6th one and says 59678 records processed,
>> then starts to decrement. 7th says 50678, 8th says 41768, 9th says
>> 32678, 10th says 23678, 11th says 14678, and 12th says 5678.
>>
>> FROM file has 113679 records.
>>
>>
>> :FCOPY FROM=DMMRE03Q;TO=DMMRE1;SUBSET=1,9000;NEW
>>
>> HP31900A.05.04 FILE COPIER (C) HEWLETT-PACKARD CO. 1999
>>
>> 9000 RECORDS PROCESSED *** 0 ERRORS
>>
>> END OF SUBSYSTEM
>>
>>
>> :FCOPY FROM=DMMRE03Q;TO=DMMRE2;SUBSET=9001,18000;NEW
>>
>> HP31900A.05.04 FILE COPIER (C) HEWLETT-PACKARD CO. 1999
>>
>> 18000 RECORDS PROCESSED *** 0 ERRORS
>>
>> END OF SUBSYSTEM
>>
>
> *Doug Werth* | VP of Operations
> (513) 922-0509 x426
> (513) 312-4883 (mobile)
> [log in to unmask] LinkedIn profile
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/doug-werth>
>
> <http://www.beechglen.com>
> Enterprise Solutions and Support Services
--
Tracy Johnson
BT
NNNN
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
