HP3000-L Archives

November 2020, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stan Sieler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stan Sieler <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 20 Nov 2020 15:06:16 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Re:

> I may have given some bad information.  Stan pointed out to me that the
> 9x7's have a built in battery for short term power failures.   I do know we
> got the 9x7's first, then upgraded to the 928's very shortly thereafter.
> It would be interesting if someone did the test today, would the battery
> even work?  Assuming it hasn't been replaced.
>
>
I'd be very very surprised if an original battery in a 9x7 still worked!

I'd also be mildly surprised (and disappointed) to find that anyone is
still using a 9x7 today ...
instead of something newer.  (Newer machines are incredibly inexpensive,
and provide a
lot better performance than most 9x8s, well ... at least for single
processor models :)

The low-end 9x8s (918, 928, at least) had a hole inside for a battery
backup ... but there is no
connector (thus, no way to make a battery useful).  I suspect that during
the R&D phase they hoped
to have internal battery backup, but the power draw of the newer 9x8 (vs.
the 9x7) was simply too great
(*or* the division selling the new HP UPS had something to say about
allowing customers to not need their product? :)

Stan

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2