HP3000-L Archives

July 2015, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: "N" Class Server Reliability
From:
krikor Gullekian <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
krikor Gullekian <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 27 Jul 2015 18:29:40 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines) 
We just got rid of our N class server after the migration.  You could've bought it...
We had it since 2000... and the main problem we were having lately was with the tape drives, we had once a DTC or processor issue and after a cold start it went away.
Thanks,Krikor Gullekian
 
      From: Steven Ruffolo <[log in to unmask]>
 To: [log in to unmask] 
 Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 1:14 PM
 Subject: [HP3000-L] "N" Class Server Reliability
   
As everyone on this list I'm concerned about the reliability going forward of our "N" class servers.  Are there any type of studies and metrics that could be used to determine how the failure rates of the parts on/in the "N" class will increase linear with the age of the equipment.  I would imagine this would be true for any systems, but we have had an increase in processor failures over the last year.  Is this coincidental or should we start trying to stock pile additional spares?  Thanks.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *


* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
  

ATOM RSS1 RSS2