Simple, just make sure the people in Congress end up with the same
plan as the rest of us.

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:22:34 -0500, John Lee <[log in to unmask]> 
wrote:

>And that company also has sole authority to approve new devices and
>medications, license doctors and hospitals, etc.  There are lots of
>conflicts.  Not to say some form of govt health ins won't work, but it's
>fraught with potential for bribery, kickbacks, and all the other wonderful
>things that large amounts of money and politicians attract.  And the
>thought of the bureaucracy makes me cringe...
>
>John Lee
>
>
>
>At 10:14 AM 8/25/09 -0700, Craig Lalley wrote:
>>It seems to me, that if a company was running your retirement plan with
>>extreme efficiency (Social Security).
>>
>>Then if that same company would also take care of your health insurance...
>>
>>Wouldn't there be a conflict of interest?
>>
>>-Craig
>>
>>
>>* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
>>* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
>>Checked by AVG.
>>Version: 7.5.560 / Virus Database: 270.12.26/2116 - Release Date: 5/15/09
>>6:16 AM
>
>* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
>* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *