HP3000-L Archives

May 2009, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brice Yokem <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Brice Yokem <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 13 May 2009 17:10:39 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
>   Ok... this one is interesting... and cite Eugene V. as the
>authority... 
>   This is interesting to me as here the Courts rule that the Police
>obtaining a warrant was nice but unnecessary and then the Court tells
>the State "Improve the law so a Warrant will be needed!"
>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/41784?
netht=rn_051309&nladnam
>e=051309dailynewsamal

I am not sure how this is different than attaching a 'tracer' to a 
vehicle.  If the tracer is illgal without a warrant, then so should
this be, I think.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2