HP3000-L Archives

February 2009, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Lee <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:32:00 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (126 lines)
For those of you interested, here is supposedly what each state has 
requested "stimulus" dollars for.  I have not verified it for accuracy, 
don't have time, but it's interesting anyway.  Looks like road construction 
and the building trades will keep people employed...not sure how big a 
portion of the population that is.  It doesn't look like I'd personally 
gain much.  Well, supposedly I'll see $13 more per week in my paycheck due 
to lower tax rate.

I'm quite surprised that building mass transit isn't mentioned in MN at 
all.  There appears to be such an obvious need for it, and it's so much 
greener than one-person-in-a-car commuting.

John Lee





>  Stimulus Pork by State?
>Date: Friday, February 6, 2009, 12:07 PM  Desert Palm cal.  30 mil for a 
>pool complex.
>
>
>What is immediately stimulative?  What might better be considered in 
>separate spending bills?  What is social spending?  What programs, once 
>initiated, would require indefinite ongoing funding?  And most important, 
>"What's in it for ME, and MY district?"
>
><http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state>http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state 
>
>
>Find projects by state or territory
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/AK>Alaska (46 projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/AL>Alabama (318 
> projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/AR>Arkansas (199 
> projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/AZ>Arizona (743 
> projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/CA>California (1971 
> projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/CO>Colorado (201 
> projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/CT>Connecticut (449 
> projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/DC>Washington, D.C. 
> (8 projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/DE>Delaware (7 projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/FL>Florida (1752 
> projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/GA>Georgia (266 
> projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/HI>Hawaii (316 projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/IA>Iowa (51 projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/ID>Idaho (348 projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/IL>Illinois (1031 
> projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/IN>Indiana (713 
> projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/KS>Kansas (139 projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/KY>Kentucky (524 
> projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/LA>Louisiana (433 
> projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/MA>Massachusetts (266 
> projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/MD>Maryland (54 
> projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/ME>Maine (72 projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/MI>Michigan (782 
> projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/MN>Minnesota (335 
> projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/MO>Missouri (403 
> projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/MS>Mississippi (552 
> projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/MT>Montana (57 projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/NC>North Carolina 
> (319 projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/ND>North Dakota (61 
> projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/NE>Nebraska (154 
> projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/NJ>New Jersey (261 
> projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/NM>New Mexico (215 
> projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/NV>Nevada (163 projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/NY>New York (289 
> projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/OH>Ohio (847 projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/OK>Oklahoma (223 
> projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/OR>Oregon (159 projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/PA>Pennsylvania (352 
> projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/PR>Puerto Rico (340 
> projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/RI>Rhode Island (116 
> projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/SC>South Carolina 
> (271 projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/SD>South Dakota (30 
> projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/TN>Tennessee (103 
> projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/TX>Texas (1240 projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/UT>Utah (298 projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/VA>Virginia (400 
> projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/VT>Vermont (61 projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/WA>Washington (368 
> projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/WI>Wisconsin (358 
> projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/WV>West Virginia (1 
> projects)
>    * <http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/by_state/WY>Wyoming (85 
> projects)
>


* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2