I don't understand your problem with the NYT; they were very gracious in not
asking McCain also give them his left leg and right arm before they would
print his op-ed.

You make it sound like you just discovered the NYT was, shall we say, a
little biased.  At this point, they so believe in the inevitability of Lord
Obama, they don't even care about putting up some type of façade of
impartiality.

Denys

-----Original Message-----
From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
Of Brice Yokem
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 2:33 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [HP3000-L] OT: Really true?

McCain and the N Y Times 

McCain sent an op-ed piece to the New York Times. Obama had one last 
week, so it was hardly surprising. The Times rejected McCain's editorial 
demanding that  

"the article would have to articulate, in concrete terms, how Senator McCain

defines victory in Iraq. It would also have to lay out a clear plan for
achieving 
victory -- with troops levels, timetables and measures for compelling the
Iraqis 
to cooperate.
"And it would need to describe the senator’s Afghanistan strategy, spelling
out 
how it meshes with his Iraq plan."

Astonishing. All this before the mighty New York Time will accept an op-ed 
piece by the nominee of the Republican Party. Which tells us pretty well all
we 
need to know about where the Times stands on the election. Read again what 
the editors demanded. Think on it.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.5/1568 - Release Date: 7/23/2008
6:55 AM

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *