I am thinking the Judge personally owes the Father a year's child support as
she has taken parental responsibility in this case 8-O.

As I researched more sites, I found additional info than what was documented
in this news article.  The non-custodial parent "mother" and the child were
aligned against the custodial parent "father" in this case.  It was not
strictly the child taking dad to court.

It does seem that the father does have a case against the judge for usurping
the custody agreement, but like anything else in this world, rules are
created to be broken...  I used to drive a dump truck... that double line
down the middle of the road is really only a suggestion, not really the law
9-).

-j

-----Original Message-----
From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
Of Craig Lalley
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 4:22 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [HP3000-L] OT: and we thought the Texas courts were bad

Canadians have it worse.

A Canadian court has ruled that a father cannot ground his daughter, barring
her from going on a camping trip!

http://www.bpnews.net/BPFirstPerson.asp?ID=28350

Next I suppose the Madame Justice will rule that parents have to send
their kids on school trips even if they don?t, say, think they are
worth the money.  And how about a child?s allowance.  Will that now be
subject to judicial review?

Maybe a Canadian from the list can set me straight.

-Craig


* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *