Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 18 May 2008 08:10:43 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Matt writes:
[snip]
>The 0 or ZERO dilemma was an observational statement, not a guess, from a
>problem that thrust up it's rather unwelcome existence back around 1992 or
>so with the compiler on MPE/XL, leading to a preference for the ZERO syntax.
I wasn't 'there' in the shop you are referencing, but I can say that since 1979
with > 4 million lines of HP COBOL code I have never seen that behavior. I have
seen other bugs, some pretty gnarly. Since a compiler is a program written by
people who aren't perfect it is guaranteed to have some, just like all the code
I have written over the years :-)
Also, '<>' is an HP COBOL extension that won't compile on all other
COBOL compilers, but that would be caught by the compiler in question...
duane
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|