Denys,

I was not attacking your statements.  I was simply looking for the 
source data for your statements, so I can make up my own mind.   The web 
pages I found all used graphs to make there point. Some of them where 
anti AGW and echoed your statements almost word for word.  Others  used 
the same graphs and were pro AGW.  In all the pages I could not find a 
web reference to the data from which the graphs were created.  I was 
just wondering if you had found a link for the source data for these 
graphs. I could then do my own analysis and draw my own conclusions, and 
not rely on the propaganda from either side of the AGW debate.

Andy


Denys Beauchemin wrote:
> I said "close to one degree Celsius."  .75C is pretty close.
>
> The point is that it took a hundred years to add a similar amount and we
> lost it in one year.  I hope we do not lose any more.
>
> Let's also remember the Kyoto protocol calls for the virtual destruction of
> economonies to lower the temperature by .01 degree of less over decades.
>
> The AGW crowd always talks to us about fractions of degrees bringing on
> apocalyptic consequences; we just dropped a more significant amount than
> they ever talked about.
>
> Denys...
>
>   

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *