In times past and jobs long forgotten; I dropped users into the snails
pace of the big "E", only when I felt like exerting "power" over those
who would not comply with the wishes of management.
-----Original Message-----
From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Robert Mills
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 5:29 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: SHOWQ command and Quantum question
At my last gig we used the E queue but it had been heavily modified to
sit between the C and D queues. In our case E stood for Express and was
only for urgent low resource/impact jobs.
regards,
Robert W.Mills
Systems Development Manager
Pinnacle Arvato
(020) 8309 3604
-----Original Message-----
From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Tony Summers
Sent: 31 January 2007 13:13
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] SHOWQ command and Quantum question
Avoid A and B queues for your programs/jobs - those are reserved for
system processes.
Generally use the C queue for sessions and D queue for jobs, although
some 3rd party products that run via background jobs need up-lifting to
CQ. We also run some of our own "important" background jobs in the C
queue.
I've not often seen the E queue being used except for un-important jobs
that have no possiblity of impeding (e.g. tranasction locks) other
processes.
-----Original Message-----
From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Skiba, Bruno
Sent: 30 January 2007 23:26
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [HP3000-L] SHOWQ command and Quantum question
Greetings to all you Listers out there!
I want to pick at some of those massive brains out there with some MPE
wizardry.
I was wondering about how others have their systems setup with regard to
running jobs in different queues.
If I issue a "showq;active":
I get a table like this:
DORMANT RUNNING
Q PIN JOBNUM Q PIN JOBNUM
B U2603 #J3459
C M993 #S6417
C U1833 #J3917
D U3000 #J3941
------QUANTUM-------
QUEUE BASE LIMIT MIN MAX ACTUAL BOOST TIMESLICE
----- ---- ----- --- --- ------ ----- ---------
CQ 152 200 1 2000 2 DECAY 200
DQ 202 238 2000 2000 2000 DECAY 200
EQ 240 253 2000 2000 2000 DECAY 200
I guess I need some more information about how this mechanism works.
It seems to me that the CQ gets all the available QUANTUM allocated to
it, yet is currently using 2.
I guess I'm wondering if this should be a little more "balanced" and is
there a way to change this situation or is it even necessary?
I know that since we migrated to UC4 (on MPE) most of the production
jobs that
UC4 processes run at a DQ.
We only have some higher priority jobs running all the time at CQ and 1
or 2 of our realtime jobs run at BQ.
Thanks,
Bruno
Bruno Skiba
Computer Operator, Corporate HQ
Phone: +1(603)422-8373
mailto: bskiba -at- servicecu -dot- org
STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail, and any attachments, is
intended only for use by the addressee and may contain legally
privileged or confidential information. The opinions expressed here are
my own and do not necessarily represent those of Service Credit Union.
If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any
attachments, is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please immediately notify me by telephone, permanently delete the
original and any copy of the e-mail.
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
The contents of this email are confidential to the intended recipient
and may not be disclosed. Although it is believed that this email and
any attachments are virus free, it is the responsibility of the
recipient to confirm this.
Smith & Williamson Corporate Finance Limited - A member of the London
Stock Exchange.
A member of M&A International Inc. http://www.mergers.net Registered in
England No. 4533970. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services
Authority Smith & Williamson Investment Management Limited, Registered
No. 976145. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services
Authority.
Smith & Williamson Pension Consultancy Limited - Independent
Intermediary. Registered No. 3133226. Authorised and regulated by the
Financial Services Authority.
Smith & Williamson Fund Administration Limited, Registered No. 1934644.
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.
Smith & Williamson Limited - A member of Nexia International.
Registered in England No. 4534022. Regulated by the Institute of
Chartered Accountants in England & Wales for a range of investment
business activities.
NCL Investments Limited, Registered No. 1913794.
Member of the London Stock Exchange authorised and regulated by the
Financial Services Authority.
Registered Office: 25 Moorgate, London EC2R 6AY
Telephone: 020 7131 4000 http://www.smith.williamson.co.uk
Nexia Smith & Williamson Audit Limited - A member of Nexia
International. Registered in England No. 4469576.
Nexia Smith & Williamson Audit Limited is a company registered to carry
out audit work and is regulated for a range of investment activities by
the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales. Smith &
Williamson Limited is a separate company that provides professional
resources and certain services to Nexia Smith & Williamson Audit Limited
under the terms of a formal agreement on an arm's length basis.
Registered Office: 25 Moorgate, London EC2R 6AY
Telephone: 020 7131 4000 http://www.nexiasmith.williamson.co.uk
All telephone calls are recorded for business purposes.
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
