I know they're attempting to be humorous, but we do have that policy for 
all of our elected officials.  It's called an election!  How about a "No 
voter left behind" movement?  Do your homework and  hold your elected 
officials accountable instead of letting them rob the treasury with selfish 
motives.

John Lee

At 11:26 AM 1/22/07 -0500, Bruce Collins wrote:
>John Clogg wrote:
>>What is the solution, then?  Public schools are required to accept any 
>>student.
>
>Perhaps you need to adopt a "No Presidents Left Behind" Policy :-)
>
>http://www.avantnews.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=328
>
>Here's an excerpt:
>"
>A key provision of No President Left Behind is the requirement that the 
>office of the presidency develop a collection of assessments, policy 
>success rates, and other indicators on which presidential performance can 
>be judged. Presidents will be required to meet Adequate Yearly Progress 
>(AYP) levels across the range of indicators, cross-referenced with goals 
>as announced in campaign appearances, State of the Union speeches, and 
>other public events.
>
>Presidents who fail to meet AYP levels, to be externally assessed though a 
>rigorous NPLB annual testing program, are considered to have "fallen 
>short", which then qualifies the failing president for additional 
>assistance in the form of better advisors, better policies, and, in 
>extreme cases, remedial education.
>"
>
>Bruce
>
>* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
>* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *