Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:26:59 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Re:
> We have been battling keeping the numbers of extents low on our system
> by defragging drive,using the Newci command and keeping an adequate
> amount of free disc space. Our Extent B_Tree is still up in the 95%. We
> are planning on doing more defrags but we wanted to know do anyone have
> any other suggestions.
Our free TBLTEST utility,
http://www.allegro.com/software/hp3000/allegro.html#TBLTEST
may be of use.
I'd be happy to look at the output of:
:tbltest.pub.allegro "vsod all entries 100 to foo"
which will purge/create a local file called "foo" and
write a brief report to it.
Also, if you have MPEX you might want to try:
:mpex
listf / (numextents > 500), 2
and email me the results.
The basic recommendation: for those files that have hundreds
or thousands of extents, use MPE's COPY command (or Adager's
COPY / SETMOVE command) to rename/copy them. The copy will likely
have far fewer extents. MPEX is NOT recommended, because it defaults
to doing a faithful job of copying: including replicating the number
of extents. The CI COPY command and the LPS "REP" tool both seem
to result in fewer extents. (Note: LPS "REP" may require a current
version.)
BTW, I'm not sure why "Newci" was mentioned ... that seems targeted
towards reducing the cost of logging on, not the number of extents used
in the extent B-Tree table.
Stan
--
Stan Sieler
[log in to unmask]
www.allegro.com/sieler/wanted/index.html
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|