OPENMPE Archives

September 2006

OPENMPE@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Roy Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Roy Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 14 Sep 2006 20:14:22 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
In message 
<[log in to unmask]>, Pete 
<[log in to unmask]> writes

<Snip>

>Which brings me back to my original idea.  Use Linux as the chassis
>and build a user mode MPE interior with all of the familiar controls,
>layout, and easy-of-use design.  The key in a nutshell, is to build a
>wall of MPE intrinsics separating user mode MPE on one side, and a
>Linux platform on the other.  Between 85% to 95% of MPE/iX can be
>thrown away as not only unnecessary, but replaced by better components
>of a Linux platform and with no ongoing support costs, with free
>enhancements, and with free support of new server hardware and
>peripherals.  In this scenario, you are not trying to beat Linux
>(which even MS has failed miserably to squash for over 10 years), you
>are joining Linux, and acquiring all of its resources by default.  I
>still haven't seen anything that says this idea won't work, nor have I
>seen any other idea that is anywhere near as economically feasible.
>If I am wrong on either account, please enlighten me.
>
>- Pete

I don't think you are wrong at all.

I think you are describing Transport pretty closely.

http://www.xformix.com/xform/xformmf.htm
-- 
Roy Brown        'Have nothing in your houses that you do not know to be
Kelmscott Ltd     useful, or believe to be beautiful'  William Morris

ATOM RSS1 RSS2