Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:12:40 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> > Ask the families of our war dead if they think we should hand
> > over security of our ports to a foreign government. The very
> > idea of it is obscene. ...
The control of these ports is already in foreign hands. The UAE company is
in the position of managing the US ports, because it bought the British
company that was managing them until now. They would manage 6 of the 33 US
ports. Of the other 27, several are managed by other foreign companies,
including Chinese and Singaporean companies. By the way, I'm not sure this
deal is about "handing over security." That is still the job of the Customs
Department.
I do not offer these comments to support the deal, only to clarify it. We
definitely need to ask the question of whether foreign concerns should be
operating US ports, and whether adequate safeguards are in place. We need
to avoid xenophobia, however, and apply the same standards to friendly Arab
countries that we apply to other foreign concerns.
Our president needs to engage in dialogue with Congress to determine whether
this is a reasonable deal, rather than simply threatening a veto, as if
Congress has no right to question the deal. It is their duty to ask those
questions.
John Clogg
_________________________________________________________________
Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|