Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 14:41:35 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> So if I want to read a Conservative viewpoint, I would read
> NR. If I want to find out what the ACP has to say, it would
> read the DW. If I wanted an impartial view, the mainstream
> press is where I -should- go, btu I do not find one there.
In the second paragraph, you state you're searching for an impartial
view, to which (by my interpretation) you're excluding NYT as a source.
It's like you want it, but don't want it at the same time.
-------------------
Mr Johnson -
Are you being deliberately obtuse, or is this just a blind spot for you?
I have not observed you playing the games some of my opponents have
played, so I am kind fo surprised at this response.
The whole point of what I am saying is the mainstream press ought to be
impartial, but it is not. You might not agree with that statement, but
you should be able to agree that is what I have been trying to say.
Maybe it is just Monday...
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|